Sensoria
2004. SEM
2. Second & Third Year Studio. Interior
Design Program.
School of Architecture + Design. RMIT University. Melbourne. Australia.
Christopher Kaltenbach with Ramesh Ayyar, Matthew
Morris, Daniel Seyd of Insite and James Steer
 |
>joey |
 |
>Kilpatrick |
| |
' . . . it is a regime that Deleuze
and Guattari would call 'matter-function'.
It is not a machine in the narrowly technological sense (i.e. an inert means
to
an end, an applied technology), but exhibits machinic properties
in a
diagrammatic sense (setting off multiple desires and frustrations, as
basins
of attraction bifurcate into new patterns and open alternative
possibilities).
Through
this machinic sensibility one can understand the sequence of
exercises, the
recursive sets of materials and procedures, ' |
'Operational Architecture' R.E.
Somol Inchoate |
| |
| Operational Interior > Designing
a System: |
Students used both their research
into the behaviour and site analysis of
their chosen site to develop an operational interior.
They created a system that, a) response to their
chosen behaviour,
b) activates the object or objects in relation
to the behaviour through
the use of existing service systems; heating/cooling,
security, disposal, etc.
Other sources for locating systems
are automobiles (all forms of transportation),
medical industry
and all areas of production and manufacturing. |
The students used the following
the criteria for establishing their system:
- Sensory Input
- Behaviour: What does the input activate: why is this behaviour
being created?
- Operation of System: body, pressure, heat, motor
- Media / Matter-Function / Expression - an effect that has an
affect.
- Cause / Result
|
Through identifying what sensory
input they wanted to use in relation to
their behaviour, they located
various technologies from these systems to
develop their system.
They were to use their original site and all modifications
to the site were
open to their discretion. |
| |
| |
|